True or False: In evidence collection, the general rule is that more evidence is better than less.

The assertion that more evidence is better than less is fundamental in the field of criminal investigation and evidence collection. Collecting a greater quantity of evidence increases the likelihood of obtaining relevant information that could support or refute a hypothesis about the crime.

In many cases, a wide range of evidence can provide a more complete picture of the event being investigated, leading to more robust conclusions. This diversity can include physical evidence, witness statements, and digital evidence, among others. When investigators gather ample evidence, they enhance their chances of accurately reconstructing the events that took place, identifying potential suspects, and ultimately pursuing a successful prosecution.

Additionally, having a wealth of evidence allows for cross-verification. Different pieces of evidence can corroborate each other, strengthening the overall case. The quality of evidence is crucial, of course, but the quantity can also play a vital role in ensuring a thorough investigation.

While there are instances where the relevance and quality of evidence outweigh sheer quantity, the principle that more evidence is generally advantageous holds true in many investigative scenarios.